<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mattrutherfordDOTcom &#187; SMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattrutherford.com/tag/sms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattrutherford.com</link>
	<description>with an eenie, meenie, minie mo - and an ip, dip, dogshit, rock and roll</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter ends SMS updates &#8211; not the smartest move?</title>
		<link>http://www.mattrutherford.com/2008/08/14/twitter-ends-sms-updates-not-the-smartest-move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattrutherford.com/2008/08/14/twitter-ends-sms-updates-not-the-smartest-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattrutherford.com/?p=969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With an email – and this blog post – Twitter ended the outbound delivery of SMS updates, inbound updates are still OK, but people are a bit peeved at the change. I’m not a huge SMS receiver of messages, but I do update via SMS and I can’t help thinking that it might have been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mattrutherford.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/image3.png" rel="lightbox[969]" rel="lightbox"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" align="left" src="http://www.mattrutherford.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/image-thumb2.png" width="226" height="62" /></a>With an email – <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/2008/08/changes-for-some-sms-usersgood-and-bad.html">and this blog post</a> – <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> ended the <strong>outbound</strong> delivery of SMS updates, <strong>inbound </strong>updates are still OK, but <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080813/p145#a080813p145">people are a bit peeved</a> at the change.</p>
<p>I’m not a huge SMS receiver of messages, but I do update via SMS and I can’t help thinking that it might have been a smarter decision to cut the free service, but at the same point enable a paid model that would allow SMS-junkies to continue getting their regular fix of 140 character goodness. It would have been EVEN SMARTER to at least ask peoples opinions before the big switch off.</p>
<p>On top of the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/scriptingnews/2537265280/sizes/o/">fail-whale</a> and <a href="http://status.twitter.com/">system instabilities</a> over recent months, this cannot be seen as a positive move.</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/mattr">I can be found on Twitter here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattrutherford.com/2008/08/14/twitter-ends-sms-updates-not-the-smartest-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

